🧱 The United States is Building a Military Base in Gaza. However Bad You Think It is, It's Worse.
Not a Palestinian-led recovery authority. Not schools. Not hospitals. A U.S.-coordinated military base inside of Gaza. Paid for by American Taxpayers.
Before Gaza has been rebuilt, the United States Government is already building a highly fortified military base there.
Before Palestinians have sovereignty, Washington is preparing a command structure.
Before Gaza has safety, freedom, or even a real political future, the United States is helping construct the infrastructure to manage what comes next from just outside the cage.
That should alarm every single one of us.
Family, this is why The North Star exists. Mainstream outlets will call this “stabilization,” “coordination,” or “postwar planning,” but we are not obligated to use the language of the governments that armed, funded, and protected this genocide. We are here to tell the truth plainly. If you believe that work matters, click here to become a member of The North Star.
According to an Israel Hayom report by Danny Zaken, the U.S. military has begun building a large base near the Gaza border, not far from the Re’im military camp. The report says the base is intended to serve as a combined military and civilian headquarters for organizations and forces expected to operate in the area under what it describes as the Trump plan.
That alone is the story.
Because if the first major infrastructure of “peace” is a military base, then we should ask what kind of peace is actually being planned.
Israel Hayom reported that the new base is meant to replace the multinational headquarters that had been operating in Kiryat Gat, where representatives from more than two dozen countries had been involved at the height of activity. The report says most of those representatives left after the war with Iran broke out, and that Washington is now moving forward with a new site closer to Gaza, including tenders for mobile structures and plans for a command-and-control tower.
A tower. Mobile structures. A military-civilian headquarters. Built in coordination with Israel. Near Gaza’s perimeter.
This is not a neutral detail. This is the shape of power.
For months, U.S. officials have presented their Gaza plans as humanitarian and stabilizing. Reuters previously reportedthat roughly 200 U.S. troops were operating from a Civil-Military Coordination Center in Kiryat Gat, with expertise in transport, planning, security, and engineering. That center included Israeli, British, and Canadian personnel and was tasked with monitoring the ceasefire, organizing aid, and helping plan an international force for Gaza.
At the time, U.S. officials insisted American troops would not enter Gaza. But that assurance does not answer the deeper question.
Who gave Washington the right to design Gaza’s future?
Who gave Israel the right to coordinate the reconstruction of the society it helped destroy? And where, exactly, are Palestinians in this plan?
That is the missing center of the entire story. Israel Hayom discusses the Board of Peace, expert committees, international forces, foreign governments, infrastructure, rubble removal, and command operations. But Gaza is not an empty project site. Gaza is not a battlefield spreadsheet. Gaza is not a humanitarian management problem waiting for generals, contractors, and foreign committees to solve.
Gaza belongs to Palestinians.
If Palestinians are not leading the future of Gaza, then the future being built is not freedom. It is administration from above.
This becomes even more disturbing when we place the new report beside what was already reported earlier this year. In February, The Guardian reported that Trump officials were planning a 5,000-person military base inside Gaza, based on Board of Peace contracting records reviewed by the outlet. The proposed compound, according to The Guardian, would spread across more than 350 acres and serve as a military operating base for a future International Stabilization Force.
The details are chilling. The Guardian reported that the planned military outpost would eventually include 26 trailer-mounted armored watchtowers, bunkers, a small-arms range, a warehouse for military equipment, and barbed wire around the entire site.
That is not the blueprint for Palestinian freedom.
That is the blueprint for a fortified occupation.
The Guardian also reported that the Board of Peace is chaired by Donald Trump and led in part by Jared Kushner, and that its charter appears to grant Trump permanent leadership and control. Rutgers law professor Adil Haque described the Board of Peace to The Guardian as a legal shell that, in practice, allows the United States to use it for its own purposes.
That detail matters because it tells us what kind of authority is being constructed. This is not a Palestinian-led recovery process. This is not international solidarity under Palestinian consent. This is a U.S.-driven governance structure, wrapped in international language, built around military planning, and positioned over Gaza’s future.
The Guardian’s article was about a planned base inside Gaza. Israel Hayom’s report describes a base near Gaza’s border. They may not be the same site. But together, they point in the same direction: the United States is not merely talking about humanitarian aid. It is building and planning military infrastructure around the future governance and control of Gaza.
And the language of “stabilization” should not fool us.
In the history of occupation, empire, and foreign intervention, “stability” is often what powerful states call controlwhen they want it to sound benevolent. “Security” is what they call domination when they want it to sound necessary. “Reconstruction” is what they call the phase after destruction, especially when the destroyers still expect to shape what gets rebuilt.
That is what we have to confront here.
The same governments that armed and protected Israel’s genocide now want to manage the aftermath.
The same Israeli military that helped turn Gaza into rubble is reportedly coordinating the base that will help organize Gaza’s next phase. The same American government that shielded Israel diplomatically now wants to present itself as a neutral stabilizer.
That is not neutrality.
That is power laundering itself through humanitarian language.
The land question makes all of this even more alarming. The Guardian reported that it was unclear who owned the land where the planned military compound would be built, while much of southern Gaza was under Israeli control. Diana Buttu, a Palestinian-Canadian lawyer and former peace negotiator, asked the obvious question in The Guardian: “Whose permission did they get?”
That question should sit at the center of this entire story.
Because if Palestinians did not consent to this, then it is not reconstruction. It is domination with a construction contract.
Israel Hayom also reported that five countries have approved sending forces to the area: Indonesia, Morocco, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, and Albania. Three others — Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Azerbaijan — have expressed willingness in principle, though the report says most countries have suspended practical consent because of the war with Iran. Indonesia, according to the report, is continuing to train a force of about 5,000 troops for the mission.
That sounds international. But it is not that simple.
The report says Israel refuses to allow soldiers from countries it considers hostile, including Pakistan and Turkey. Think about what that means. Even the so-called international force is being filtered through Israeli approval. Israel, the occupying power and the state responsible for genocide in Gaza, is helping determine which countries may participate in the force that will shape Gaza’s future.
An international force vetted by Israel is not international justice.
It is occupation with a guest list.
And even inside the Israeli security establishment, the report says there is deep doubt that the political track will work. One security source told Israel Hayom that, under current assessments, renewed fighting in Gaza is more likely than Hamas being disarmed through diplomacy.
That may be the most revealing line in the entire story.
If the people building this apparatus believe renewed fighting is more likely than a diplomatic breakthrough, then what is the base really for? Is it for peace, or for the next phase? Is it for reconstruction, or for managing the battlefield after diplomacy fails? Is it for helping Palestinians rebuild their lives, or for keeping Gaza under a U.S.-Israeli security architecture while everyone pretends this is humanitarian?
Those questions go to the heart of what is being built.
Because Gaza does not need a command tower before it needs homes. Gaza does not need an international force curated by Israel before it needs freedom. Gaza does not need a military-civilian headquarters on its border before it needs an end to siege, starvation, displacement, occupation, apartheid, and genocide.
Gaza needs hospitals that function. Gaza needs schools. Gaza needs clean water. Gaza needs families reunited. Gaza needs disabled children cared for. Gaza needs doctors, nurses, teachers, engineers, and builders. Gaza needs Palestinians to decide their own future.
What Gaza does not need is the United States and Israel building the infrastructure of control and calling it peace.
One of the things Islam teaches, and something I want my non-Muslim readers to understand, is that trust and authority are sacred responsibilities. In the Qur’an, Allah commands people to return trusts to those entitled to them and, when judging between people, to judge with justice. You can read that teaching in Qur’an 4:58. That matters here because Gaza’s future is not a possession to be handed from one empire to another. It is a trust that belongs to the people of Gaza.
No country that helped destroy Gaza has the moral right to appoint itself guardian over Gaza.
No military alliance has the right to turn Palestinian sovereignty into an administrative problem.
No “peace board” has the right to rebuild Gaza without the consent and leadership of Palestinians themselves.
That is the moral line.
If Washington wants to help Gaza, it can stop arming Israel. It can end diplomatic cover for genocide. It can support Palestinian-led reconstruction. It can fund hospitals without controlling them. It can support schools without militarizing them. It can help clear rubble without building command infrastructure over the people buried beneath it.
But a base on Gaza’s border is not liberation.
A command tower is not justice.
A military-civilian headquarters built with Israel is not Palestinian self-determination.
It is the architecture of control.
This is the part that mainstream coverage will likely soften. They will talk about deadlock, stabilization, disarmament, reconstruction, international partners, and security coordination. They will make it sound technical, complicated, and inevitable. But the basic moral truth is plain enough: after helping Israel destroy Gaza, the United States is now preparing to help manage Gaza.
That should outrage us.
It should alarm every person who cares about Palestinian freedom. It should alarm every person who understands that reconstruction without sovereignty is just another form of domination. It should alarm every person who knows that military bases do not magically become humanitarian projects because officials attach civilian language to them.
The Trump plan for Gaza appears to begin not with Palestinian rights, but with foreign command.
Not with freedom, but with control.
Not with justice, but with infrastructure for whatever comes next.
And if even Israeli security sources reportedly believe renewed fighting is more likely than diplomacy, then we should stop pretending this is simply about peace.
The United States is building a base near Gaza.
The Guardian previously reported plans for a massive military base inside Gaza.
The question is not just where these bases are being built.
The question is what future they are being built to enforce.
This is why The North Star exists. We are not here to translate domination into polite language. We are not here to pretend that a military base becomes humanitarian because powerful governments say so. We are here to tell the truth clearly, with receipts, and the truth is this: Gaza does not need a U.S.-Israeli architecture of control. Gaza needs freedom.
If you believe independent journalism like this needs to exist, click here to join The North Star as a monthly, annual, or founding member.
Love and appreciate each of you!
Your friend and brother,
Shaun
The United States government is SOOOOO far out of steps with its own taxpayers. And we aren't doing enough about it.
Its simply appalling that the US is doing this and doing it in collaboration with israel. Bebe has found his useful idiot and is going to keep him close and do whatever the hell they want. We need to wean Israel off the US teat and start holding them accountable. They have shown that they do not care about anything but their own agenda and the US marching in lockstep with them is shameful. They are so arrogant and destructive. They need to be reined in and put in their place but that wont happen any time soon because of the fanta menace and AIPAC.