🤯My educated guess is that you didn't know Jacob Rubenstein shot and killed Lee Harvey Oswald. Here are 5,000 words on it.

This thing has sooooooooo many layers and I will do my best to peel them back here one by one.

🚨 Friends — You will not read this story in any mainstream history book. You won’t hear it on CNN, or in your kids’ classrooms. The fight between John F. Kennedy and Israel over nuclear weapons was one of the most dangerous standoffs of the 20th century — and yet it’s been deliberately erased from our national memory. I’m telling you the truth they buried. But to keep doing this work, I need you with me.
👉🏽 Click here to subscribe now.

🟥 The Forgotten Man in America’s Greatest Murder

Unless you are in a very tiny percentage of Americans, I am guessing you’ve literally never heard the name “Jacob Rubenstein.”

And yet Jacob Rubenstein, hidden behind the street name Jack Ruby, changed the course of American history in a single flash of violence.

What I am about to tell you sounds so ridiculous, and almost fictional, that I don’t think I would have ever believed it myself had I not meticulously fact-checked every word. Real life is stranger than fiction. And this story — his story — is one of the strangest.

Most modern Americans have no idea who Jacob Rubenstein was. They’ve heard the name “Jack Ruby” in passing, maybe once in a high school classroom, maybe in a quick documentary clip. But they don’t know his real name. They don’t know his background. They don’t know what he believed. They don’t know what he said under oath about why he did what he did.

And that ignorance isn’t accidental. It’s engineered.

Because without question, the single most infamous crime of the 20th century in the United States — and I’d venture to say one of the most infamous crimes in American history — was the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas in 1963.

To this day, 62 years later, a clear motive is missing. The FBI documents on Kennedy’s murder are still sealed, locked away from the public for “national security reasons.” Think about that. More than half a century later, the government still tells us the truth would endanger the state itself. What does that even mean?

And if I had to give you just one key reason why we still don’t understand the full motive and network behind Kennedy’s murder, it would be this: the man we were told killed him — Lee Harvey Oswald — never got the chance to speak.

Because just 48 hours later, Oswald himself was shot and killed.

And who shot him?

A nightclub owner. A hustler. A man who hung around cops, mobsters, and strippers. A man who lived one life in the smoky clubs of Dallas and another in the pews of a Conservative synagogue.

His name was Jacob Rubenstein. You know him as Jack Ruby.

Ruby didn’t sneak into Oswald’s cell. He didn’t stalk him in a back alley. He walked directly into the Dallas Police Department’s basement, with a gun in his hand, and shot Oswald in front of dozens of cops, detectives, and reporters. America watched the murder unfold live on television. It was the first live televised killing in American history.

And then, just like that, the one man who might have explained what really happened to President Kennedy — the man who could have told us about contacts, motives, networks — was silenced forever just two days after the murder of Kennedy.

When Ruby was first asked why he did it, he gave a tidy, sentimental line: he said he wanted to spare Jackie Kennedy the pain of a public trial.

That’s the version you’ve probably heard. That’s the one the history books prefer. It’s neat. It’s emotional. And it’s a lie.

Because the following year, when Ruby testified under oath before the Warren Commission, he told a different story. A terrifying story. A story no one in the American press wanted to print in bold letters.

Ruby said, I and quote:

“Everything pertaining to what’s happening has never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts of what occurred, my motives. The people had to know why I did it, but I couldn’t tell it then. I had to shut him up.”

Read that again. Slowly.

“The world will never know the true facts.”
“My motives.”
“I had to shut him up.”

Uhhhhh. What?

You had to shut him up? From saying what? To who? What for?

The government tried to make it out like Jacob Rubenstein was losing his mind, but this wasn’t the babbling of a man in decline. This was less than a year after Kennedy was shot. Ruby wasn’t yet dying of cancer (that’s a whole different story). He was still sharp enough to run clubs from behind bars, keep friends, and sit under oath before the most powerful men in government.

And yet — here was Jacob Rubenstein, telling America that the official story was a lie.

He begged the Commission to move him to Washington because he said his life was in danger in Dallas. He said he was being used. He called himself a scapegoat. He said over and over again that the truth had not come out.

The Commission ignored it. The media ignored it. His own rabbi, an open Zionist leader who was deeply loyal to the Israeli government, tried to bury parts of it.

But I am telling you now: if you want to understand the Kennedy assassination — if you want to understand why it remains an open wound in American history — you have to start with Jacob Rubenstein. Not the caricature of Jack Ruby the hot-headed nightclub owner. Not the tabloid cover. The man himself.

Because Jacob Rubenstein was living a double life.

In public, he was “Jack Ruby” — the hustler, the showman, the man who handed out free passes to strippers and mob hangouts. But in private, he was Jacob Rubenstein — the son of Polish-Jewish immigrants, a man who kept kosher in his childhood home, who attended synagogue faithfully, who sat under the guidance of Rabbi Hillel Silverman, a man deeply tied to Zionist politics.

Ruby himself told Silverman that he didn’t just kill Oswald for America. He said he did it “for the Jewish people.”

Silverman admitted this later, then confessed: “I’ve tried to wipe that statement from my mind.”

He tried to wipe that statement from his mind?

Why? Because it was too messy. Too dangerous. Too explosive.

So history gave us the easy lie — “for Jackie.” And buried the hard truth — that Jacob Rubenstein said he killed Oswald to silence him, that he tied it to his Jewish identity, and that he literally feared a purge against Jews in America if Oswald were allowed to speak. What in the world would Oswald say that could have caused a “purge against Jews?” What’s going on here?

This is the story you’ve never been told. Not in classrooms. Not in Hollywood. Not in the sanitized documentaries.

And that’s exactly why I’m telling it now.

---

🟥 The Murder in the Basement

Of all the things we don’t know about this case, two things are undeniably true. Jacob Rubenstein shot and killed Lee Harvey Oswald, on camera, in front of witnesses, broadcast on live television. And less than a year later he said he did it for the Jewish people and to shut Oswald up.

Everything else around this case is disputed. But not this.

It was Sunday morning, November 24, 1963 — just two days after President John F. Kennedy was gunned down in Dealey Plaza. The nation was in shock, its eyes fixed on Dallas. Reporters swarmed the city. Cameras were everywhere. Every step of Oswald’s arrest and interrogation was being covered live.

Before Ruby’s bullet cut him off, Oswald had already dropped his own cryptic clue. Cameras captured him saying: “I’m just a patsy.” A patsy — a fall guy, a scapegoat. He insisted he hadn’t shot Kennedy and that he was being framed. Two days later, he was dead. And then Ruby himself, under oath, said: “I had to shut him up.” Put those two lines side by side — Oswald calling himself a patsy, Ruby saying he had to silence him — and the official story collapses into dust.

The Dallas Police Department had announced that Oswald would be transferred that morning from their headquarters to the county jail. Security was supposedly “tight.” Armed officers lined the basement garage of police headquarters. Dozens of reporters packed the narrow hallway, their cameras waiting for the first glimpse of the young man accused of killing the President of the United States.

At 11:21 a.m., the moment arrived. Oswald was led into the basement, flanked by detectives. He wore a dark sweater, his face bruised from earlier scuffles with police. He squinted into the lights and the crush of microphones. Reporters shouted questions he couldn’t answer.

Then, in a split second that would sear itself into the memory of millions, a man stepped forward out of the crowd. He wasn’t a stranger to the Dallas police. In fact, he was a familiar face. A nightclub owner. A man who hung around headquarters often, chatting with officers, handing out free passes to his strip clubs. His name was Jack Ruby.

Before anyone could react, Ruby pulled a .38 caliber Colt Cobra revolver from his coat and lunged forward. He jammed the barrel into Oswald’s stomach and fired at point-blank range.

On live television, Lee Harvey Oswald doubled over in agony, his mouth forming a silent cry as he collapsed to the basement floor.

Chaos exploded. Police officers pounced on Ruby, wrestling the gun away, pinning him down as Oswald writhed on the ground. Reporters shouted in disbelief. One of the most secure basements in America had just witnessed a murder — not in secret, but in front of the entire world.

Millions of Americans, watching the transfer live on television, gasped as the scene unfolded in real time. In living rooms across the country, children and grandparents alike saw history take another shocking turn.

Oswald was rushed to Parkland Memorial Hospital — the very same hospital where President Kennedy had been declared dead just two days earlier. Doctors tried to save him, but within an hour he was gone.

Just like that, the one man who might have explained Kennedy’s murder was silenced forever.

And Jacob Rubenstein, known to Dallas as Jack Ruby, was dragged upstairs in handcuffs. Calm at first, then agitated, then tearful, he would give his first explanation: that he had done it to spare Jackie Kennedy the heartache of a trial.

It was a neat line. Too neat.

Because when the adrenaline wore off and Ruby had time to reflect — when he sat with his rabbi, and later when he testified before the Warren Commission — his story changed. He said he killed Oswald to shut him up. And he tied it to his identity as a Jew in a city and country where he feared a backlash. “I did it for the Jewish people,” he admitted.

But that came later. In the moment, all America saw was the raw fact: Jacob Rubenstein murdered the man accused of killing the president, right in front of our eyes, in the most famous live broadcast of violence the world had ever seen.

---

🟥 The Cryptic Testimony (1964): The Real Truth

The Warren Commission was the official government body appointed by President Lyndon B. Johnson and chaired by Chief Justice Earl Warren to investigate Kennedy’s assassination. It was presented as the definitive national inquiry, but from the beginning critics argued it was designed more to calm the public than to expose uncomfortable truths.

The Warren Commission wasn’t a neutral panel of truth-seekers. It was created to calm the nation, not to ignite suspicion. Chaired by Chief Justice Earl Warren, the same body that gave America Brown v. Board of Education, it carried enormous institutional authority. But in practice, it operated like a shield — steering the country toward a story of one lone gunman, Oswald, and one lone vigilante, Ruby. It was less about solving the crime than about keeping the public from believing their government was fragile, penetrated, or complicit. That’s the stage Ruby walked onto when he testified.

When Jack Ruby took the stand before the Warren Commission in June of 1964, less than a year after he gunned down Lee Harvey Oswald on live television, America expected him to repeat the neat little story he had already fed the press — that he did it “to spare Jackie Kennedy the heartache of a trial.”

But Ruby — or rather Jacob Rubenstein, the real man beneath the tough-guy mask — didn’t stick to that script. He unraveled it. What poured out of him instead were cryptic, terrified admissions that even now should shake our understanding of what happened in Dallas.

He told the Commission:

“Everything pertaining to what’s happening has never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts of what occurred, my motives. The people had to know why I did it, but I couldn’t tell it then. I had to shut him up.”

Read that again. “The world will never know the true facts.” “My motives.” “I had to shut him up.”

This wasn’t the public showman of the Carousel Club, spinning one-liners for reporters. This was a man under oath, in the custody of the state, suddenly declaring that his act was not what America had been told it was.

Ruby begged the Commission to remove him from Dallas, claiming he was not safe there.

“Unless you take me to Washington, you can’t get the answers. My life is in danger here.”

He insisted he was being used:

“I am a scapegoat for the cause of the truth about this matter.”

These were not rehearsed talking points. They were jagged, fragmented confessions from a man who knew he had stepped into something larger than himself.

The Warren Commission brushed it off as instability. Historians for decades called it paranoia. But think about the timeline. Less than a year had passed since the assassination. Ruby’s mind had not yet rotted from years in solitary confinement. His cancer diagnosis was still years away. He was not yet the broken figure who would hallucinate about Jews being tortured in the basement.

This was the real moment of truth.

He was no longer playing “Jack Ruby” for the cameras. He was Jacob Rubenstein, cornered, scared, trying in his own desperate way to tell the country that the story we were being fed — that Oswald acted alone, that Ruby acted out of grief — was a lie.

And then there was his rabbi, Hillel Silverman. Ruby was a congregant at Silverman’s Dallas synagogue. He came regularly to say Kaddish for his father, sometimes bringing puppies to the rabbi’s home, even tending the rabbi’s dog when the family traveled to Israel. Ruby wasn’t just a nightclub man. He was a man who anchored himself in Jewish ritual and identity.

Silverman visited him in jail after the murder and later testified that Ruby gave him two different motives:

• “I did it for the American people.”

• “I did it for the Jewish people.”

But Silverman confessed years later that he had tried to erase the second explanation from his memory: “Yes, he mentioned that. But I don’t like to mention it. I think he said, ‘I did it for the Jewish people.’ But I’ve tried to wipe that statement from my mind.”

Why wipe it away? Why bury it? Because Silverman wasn’t just a rabbi — he was a past president of the Zionist Organization of America (Southwest region), an institution that fiercely promoted Jewish nationalism and the defense of Israel. In the years after Ruby’s death, Silverman was even awarded a Medal of Honor by Menachem Begin, Israel’s Prime Minister at the time, for his “distinguished service to Israel and the Jewish people.”

And who was Menachem Begin? He wasn’t just a head of state. He was the former leader of Irgun, a Zionist paramilitary group that carried out bombings in British Mandate Palestine, including the infamous King David Hotel attack in 1946. Later, as Prime Minister in the late 1970s and early 1980s, Begin authorized Israel’s boldest nuclear-related strike: the 1981 bombing of Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor — a mission designed to preserve Israel’s monopoly on nuclear weapons in the Middle East. Begin was a man who embodied the logic of Zionist militancy and the fierce protection of Israel’s power.

So when we hear that Ruby’s rabbi was a ZOA leader, decorated by Begin himself, it matters. Because it means the one religious leader closest to Ruby had both ideological and political reasons to downplay Ruby’s words about Jewish identity and fear in the Oswald killing. To admit that Ruby framed his act in terms of protecting Jews would have been dangerous, explosive, and destabilizing. It could have fueled antisemitism in America, and it could have tied a Zionist thread into the Kennedy assassination. So Silverman buried it.

First the press buried it, preferring the tidy “for Jackie” story. Then his own rabbi buried it, filtering out the uncomfortable lines.

But Ruby’s testimony to the Commission remains. It’s on the record. And when you strip away the filters, you hear it clearly: he killed Oswald to shut him up.

“The world will never know the true facts of what occurred, my motives.”

That is not the statement of a man acting alone. That is the voice of a man who had been told, or forced, to play his part — and who, for one brief, haunted moment, tried to confess it.

---

🟥 Rabbi Silverman, Zionism, and the Politics of Silence

To understand Jack Ruby — or rather Jacob Rubenstein — you have to understand his rabbi.

Ruby wasn’t some detached atheist hustler who abandoned Jewish life. Not one person who actually knew him thought of him in this way. He was a member of Congregation Shearith Israel in Dallas, and his rabbi, Hillel Silverman, knew him well. Ruby came faithfully to say Kaddish for his father.

Kaddish is the ancient Jewish prayer said for the dead. When a parent dies, a Jewish child will go to synagogue regularly — often every day for months — to recite it publicly in memory of their parent. Ruby did this for his father, which shows that behind his nightclub-owner persona, he still carried his identity as Jacob Rubenstein, the dutiful Jewish son.

He showed up at services, brought puppies to the rabbi’s home, even cared for the family dog when the Silvermans traveled. These weren’t the actions of a man cut off from religion. He was tied into his community.

And yet, Rabbi Silverman carried a second identity that mattered just as much: he was a leader in the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), serving as president of its Southwest region. The ZOA was one of the strongest voices in America pushing Jews to support Israel politically, financially, and emotionally. It wasn’t just about faith — it was about power and survival.

The ZOA’s mission was political as much as spiritual — to tie American Jewry to the survival of Israel by every means possible.

This wasn’t abstract. In later years, Silverman was personally awarded a Medal of Honor by Menachem Begin, Prime Minister of Israel, for his “distinguished service to Israel and the Jewish people.”

Menachem Begin wasn’t some mild statesman. Before he was prime minister, he was the commander of the Irgun, a Zionist underground militia in British-ruled Palestine. In 1946, his Irgun fighters blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, killing 91 people — British officials, Jews, and Arabs. It was one of the most infamous bombings of the 20th century. In 1948, Irgun was also involved in the massacre at Deir Yassin, where over 100 Palestinian villagers were slaughtered, sending terror across the land and helping to drive Palestinians from their homes during the Nakba.

Begin’s politics were built on militancy and secrecy. And as Prime Minister in the late 1970s and early 1980s, he proved it again. In 1981, Begin ordered the Israeli Air Force to carry out Operation Opera — the bombing of Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor outside Baghdad.

A nuclear reactor is usually for energy, but it can also be used to produce materials for nuclear weapons. Begin’s strike was a pre-emptive attack designed to preserve Israel’s monopoly on nuclear power in the Middle East. It was a bold violation of international law, but it set the precedent: Israel would strike any neighbor who came close to nuclear capability, while keeping its own arsenal hidden. They did it to Iran this year, but this has been their way for generations.

So when Israel Prime Minister Begin pinned a medal on Rabbi Silverman, it wasn’t just for pastoral kindness. It was recognition that Silverman was part of that Zionist project of power, protection, and silence.

And here’s where it matters for Jack Ruby.

Silverman later admitted that Ruby gave him two different explanations for killing Oswald:

• “I did it for the American people.”

• “I did it for the Jewish people.”

But Silverman said plainly in an interview before he passed: “Yes, he mentioned that. But I don’t like to mention it. I think he said, ‘I did it for the Jewish people.’ But I’ve tried to wipe that statement from my mind.”

“I did it for the Jewish people.’ But I’ve tried to wipe that statement from my mind.”

Think about that. The one man Ruby trusted spiritually deliberately erased his congregant’s most vulnerable explanation. Why? Because in the political context of Dallas antisemitism, American nationalism, and global Zionism, to admit Ruby acted somehow on behalf of Jews, as he said, could simply not be public.

It could have fueled antisemitic backlash in the U.S. It could have tied Zionist politics into the Kennedy assassination story. It could have exposed the raw nerve that Ruby himself felt: that Jews were vulnerable in America, that Oswald might embarrass or endanger them, and that killing him was, in Ruby’s mind, a defense of the Jewish people.

So Silverman buried it. Just as the Warren Commission buried Ruby’s cryptic testimony. Just as Washington buried the truth of Israel’s nuclear arsenal.

The same silence, the same filtering, the same refusal to let Americans hear what Jacob Rubenstein really said.

🟥 JFK vs. Israel: The Nuclear Clash Buried in Silence

When most Americans think about John F. Kennedy’s foreign crises, they think of Cuba. The Bay of Pigs. The Cuban Missile Crisis. Soviet ships steaming toward the blockade line in 1962. Schoolchildren hiding under desks. The world teetering on the edge of nuclear war.

That story is told in every history book. It’s emphasized in every documentary. But there was another nuclear standoffunfolding at the exact same time — and it was not with Khrushchev in Moscow, but with Ben-Gurion in Tel Aviv. It was over Israel’s secret program to build nuclear weapons at Dimona. And while the Cuban crisis has become the defining symbol of Cold War danger, the Israeli crisis has been almost completely erased from our public memory.

Why? Because in one case, the United States stood its ground and forced transparency. In the other, it blinked — and in the silence, Israel secured the Middle East’s only nuclear arsenal.

And make no mistake: the confrontation between Kennedy and Israel was not some minor diplomatic spat. It was a collision course — one that insiders at the time feared might rupture U.S.–Israeli relations permanently. It was arguably more severe, more long-term, and more destabilizing than Cuba. Because Cuba was a 13-day crisis. Israel’s nuclear program has now cast its shadow for six decades.

---

🟥 Kennedy’s Warning

From the start of his presidency, Kennedy was obsessed with nuclear proliferation. He believed — correctly — that once one nation outside the “official five” got the bomb, others would follow. His administration put enormous energy into pushing the 1963 Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, into strengthening the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and into discouraging U.S. allies from even hinting at nuclear ambitions.

And then came Israel.

The CIA had already been watching the Dimona facility in the Negev desert with growing alarm. Officially, Israel said the site was for “peaceful research.” But by 1960, U.S. intelligence concluded it was almost certainly for weapons. France had secretly built the reactor. Israeli scientists, under Ernst David Bergmann, were building the reprocessing plant to extract plutonium — the core ingredient for bombs.

Kennedy’s predecessor, Eisenhower, had tiptoed around the issue. He knew, but he didn’t confront. Kennedy, by contrast, made it a red line.

In May 1961, Kennedy wrote directly to Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion. His language was unusually blunt for a diplomatic letter:

“I am sure you will agree that the further development of nuclear weapons would involve great risk to peace in the Middle East. Therefore, our primary interest is that the reactor be devoted to peaceful purposes. We attach the greatest importance to confirmation of this by regular visits to Dimona.”

Kennedy demanded regular inspections. Not one-time tours. Not staged visits. Real access by American scientists, twice a year, with the ability to go anywhere in the complex.

For Kennedy, this was non-negotiable. If Israel wanted to keep receiving American support — military aid, economic assistance, diplomatic protection — it had to prove Dimona was peaceful.

---

🟥 Ben-Gurion’s Dance of Deception

Ben-Gurion resisted. He gave evasive answers. He insisted Dimona was for desalination, agriculture, research. He agreed to “visits” but only under highly controlled conditions. When U.S. inspectors arrived, Israeli officials built fake control rooms and staged elaborate tours that excluded the underground reprocessing facility where plutonium was being produced.

Kennedy pressed harder. By early 1963, the pressure reached breaking point. He told Israel in blunt terms: without real inspections, “America’s commitment to Israel could be seriously jeopardized.” This was as close as a U.S. president has ever come to threatening to cut the relationship.

Then, in June 1963, something extraordinary happened. Just as Kennedy’s latest ultimatum was delivered, Ben-Gurion abruptly resigned. He cited “personal reasons.” Historians still debate it, but many believe Kennedy’s nuclear pressure was the trigger. Ben-Gurion had staked his career on amimut — opacity — and Kennedy was about to blow it open.

His successor, Levi Eshkol, inherited the confrontation. Kennedy wrote again in July 1963, this time even sharper. In one letter to Eshkol, Kennedy said:

“The United States has a deep interest in Dimona being devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes. This government’s commitment to Israel would be seriously jeopardized if we could not obtain reliable information that Dimona is not being used for nuclear weapons.”

He repeated that inspections must be “reliable and regular.”

This was not a footnote. This was the President of the United States threatening to pull the plug on Israel’s most existential project.

---

🟥 November 1963

And then Kennedy was killed.

Two days later, Oswald was silenced.

And with Kennedy’s death, the confrontation died too.

Lyndon Johnson, unlike Kennedy, had no appetite for pushing Israel on nuclear weapons. By 1969, Richard Nixon cut the deal with Golda Meir that defined the policy ever since: Israel would maintain “opacity,” never testing or admitting its arsenal, and the United States would never publicly acknowledge it.

Kennedy’s red line was erased. His warnings about proliferation were forgotten. And Israel marched forward — producing enough plutonium for what experts now estimate are between 90 and 400 warheads.

The Cuban Missile Crisis is remembered as the moment the world almost ended. The Israeli nuclear crisis is forgotten, even though it succeeded in exactly what Kennedy feared most: another nation outside the treaty system building an unacknowledged nuclear arsenal.

---

🟥 Why Was This Erased?

The erasure was deliberate. The U.S. government classified and buried documents about Kennedy’s confrontation. Even the declassified letters between Kennedy and Ben-Gurion/Eshkol were hidden for decades. The narrative of Kennedy as a Cold Warrior facing down Moscow was safer than Kennedy as a president willing to confront Israel.

And the stakes were huge. If Israel had admitted to its weapons, U.S. law would have required aid to be cut off. Billions in military assistance would have been illegal. The “special relationship” would have fractured.

So Washington chose silence. And Kennedy’s assassination, whatever else it meant, sealed that silence.

---

🟥 Israel’s Policy of Assassination

To understand how high the stakes were, remember this: Israel has never hesitated to use assassination as a tool of statecraft.

In the 1960s, Mossad kidnapped and executed Nazi war criminals in South America.

In the 1970s, Israel launched Operation Wrath of God — a worldwide campaign of assassinations after the Munich Olympics, killing dozens across Europe and the Middle East.

In the 1980s and 1990s, Israel systematically targeted Palestinian leaders, from Beirut to Tunis.

In the 2000s and 2010s, Israel openly carried out “targeted killings” of Hamas leaders, Hezbollah commanders, and Iranian scientists.

And in the 2020s, it is still assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists and striking nuclear facilities.

Now, as we all know, they’ve assassinated hundreds of doctors and journalists and leaders all over Gaza. They have no shame or limits.

This is not speculation. It is the doctrine of the state. As one Mossad chief put it: “We operate in the shadows. We do what must be done.”

So when you look back to 1963, and you see John F. Kennedy pushing harder on Israel’s nuclear program than any American president before or since, you have to ask: what did Israel see him as? An ally? Or a threat to their most sacred project?

---

🟥 The Silence Today

The consequences of Kennedy’s clash with Israel are not ancient history. They are the reason the Middle East looks the way it does today. Israel has nuclear weapons. No one else in the region does. And the United States enforces that monopoly — bombing Iraq in 1981, Syria in 2007, sanctioning Iran to this day.

Kennedy’s warnings about proliferation came true. His fear that silence would buy impunity came true. And his confrontation with Israel — far more severe, far more dangerous, than Cuba — was erased.

The history books tell us about Khrushchev. They don’t tell us about Ben-Gurion. They tell us about Cuba. They don’t tell us about Dimona.

But the record is there. The letters exist. The testimony exists. The arsenal exists.

And the silence is still the loudest fact of all.

---

Friends, if you’ve read this far, you already know why this work matters. The silence around Israel’s nuclear arsenal didn’t start yesterday — it started in the Kennedy years, and it has shaped U.S. policy ever since. Our job here is to break that silence, to name what others will not, and to arm people with facts they can’t ignore.

But we can’t do it without your help. Every new subscription gives us the independence to keep digging where others are afraid to look. Please, stand with us. Help me keep telling the truths that CNN, the New York Times, and the White House refuse to tell.

👉🏽 Become a member today. Click here to subscribe.

Love and appreciate each of you.
Your friend and brother,
Shaun