🔥 Israel’s History of False Flags: Assassinations, Massacres, and Blame Shifted to Arabs and Muslims
For decades Israel killed, lied, and blamed others: King David Hotel, Lavon Affair, Lillehammer, Sabra & Shatila. These are not theories — they are facts, and Gaza is next in line
Family, if you value fearless journalism that exposes what the powerful want buried, I need you standing with me. Please become a member today — monthly, annual, or founding — so we can keep telling the truth together.
What a “False Flag Operation” Really Means
Before I ever wrote the news for a living, I read it. And one thing that always bothered me was how writers would throw around names of people, places, and terms — but almost never stop to just explain them. Sure, people can Google things. But I always told myself: if I ever became a writer, I’d take the time to break it down in plain English so all of my readers, no matter their background, could follow along.
So let me define what a false flag operation is, OK?
The term comes from old naval warfare. A warship would sail under a flag that wasn’t its own — maybe the enemy’s flag, maybe a neutral one. Then, at the last moment, it would attack. The point was deception: to commit an act of violence but trick everyone into believing someone else was responsible. Over time, the phrase came to mean any violent or criminal act carried out secretly, then blamed on another party.
And here’s the thing: Israel has used this tactic again and again — sometimes against Arabs, sometimes against Americans, sometimes even against its own allies — to frame others for its crimes. These are not rumors. They are not “urban legends.” For years I thought they were conspiracy theories, too. But I dug in, verified them, fact-checked every detail I could. And the truth is undeniable: Israel is perhaps the most prolific modern state in using false flag operations, almost always blaming Arabs and Muslims to turn the world against them.
And I challenge you: fact-check every single example I’m about to give you. In fact, you should always do that anyway. Don’t just take my word for it.
Built on Terrorism and Deception
Let’s also be clear about the timeline. The first major false flag operation we’re covering happened in 1946 — two years before the official founding of the State of Israel. That’s important. It means that long before Israel was even declared a nation, its militias were already using deception, violence, and terrorism as their operating principles.
Think about that. Israel likes to present itself to the world as a plucky democracy surrounded by enemies. But its very birth was midwifed by bombs planted in secret, disguises meant to fool the world, and massacres that were blamed on others. This is not opinion. This is fact.
And just as they framed Arabs in 1946, they frame them now in Gaza. When Israel bombs a hospital and says Hamas was hiding inside, it is the exact same script. When they starve children and call it “self-defense,” it is the same deception.
The King David Hotel Bombing (1946)
Our first case is infamous in the region, but almost unknown to most Americans. On July 22, 1946, the Zionist militia known as the Irgun, led by Menachem Begin (who would later become Prime Minister of Israel), carried out one of the deadliest terror attacks in the history of British rule in Palestine.
Their target was the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, the headquarters of the British administrative and military command. Disguised as Arab workers, the Irgun operatives smuggled milk churns filled with explosives into the hotel’s basement. The bombs went off, collapsing an entire wing of the building.
The result: 91 people killed — British officials, Jews, and Arabs alike. Dozens more were injured. It was a massacre.
And here’s where the false flag part comes in: at first, Zionist leaders denied responsibility. They pushed the idea that Arabs had carried out the bombing. Only later, once the dust settled and international outrage cooled, did Begin and others admit the Irgun had done it — and even glorified it as a strike for independence.
That’s how Israel’s political class works: commit the crime, deny it, wait until it’s safe, then reframe it as heroism. You’ve seen it. I’m just putting words to it.
Why This Matters Today
Don’t let anyone tell you this is ancient history. The tactics used at the King David Hotel are the same tactics used in Gaza today.
Disguise the act.
Commit the crime.
Blame the victims.
Rewrite the story later.
Israel was literally built on terrorism and false flag operations. Menachem Begin, the man behind this bombing, went on to become Prime Minister. Imagine if Osama bin Laden had lived long enough to become the leader of a recognized government — that’s the scale of what we’re talking about here.
The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ taught that even in war, you must not betray trust, you must not kill non-combatants, and you must not lie about who is responsible. These commands of mercy became part of Islamic tradition centuries before “international law” existed. Israel, from its earliest days, did the opposite: betrayal, deception, and civilian slaughter.
The First Domino: The King David Hotel Bombing (1946)
Two years before Israel was officially founded, on July 22, 1946, the Zionist militia Irgun — led by Menachem Begin (who would later become Prime Minister) — carried out one of the deadliest terror attacks of the British Mandate.
Let me stop right here and repeat something. This terrorist attack was openly, admittedly carried out by the future Prime Minister of Israel.
Their target was the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, which was really the nerve center of British rule. They would aim to attack the Government Secretariat in the south wing of the hotel and the British Army HQ on the upper floors, with the military telephone exchange in the basement. This was really the primary seat of power for the British in Palestine back in the day. And Irgun’s plan was to hit it hard while disguised as Arabs and then deny responsibility — the classic anatomy of a false flag. And it set a pattern that Israel would use over and over until this very day.
Why They Hit It
In late June, the British had launched Operation Agatha (Black Saturday), raiding the Jewish Agency and seizing documents implicating the underground (including Haganah) in attacks. Those files were taken to the King David Hotel’s south wing. Irgun’s motive was blunt: destroy the archives and the British center of command. By 1946, the hotel — opened in 1932 as Jerusalem’s first luxury hotel — had been massively requisitioned. Most of the south wing housed the British Secretariat; the top floors and central core carried Army HQ, military police, CID, and the exchange. In the words of a British analyst, the hotel “housed the nerve centre of British rule in Palestine.”
The Disguise and the Plan
The building’s layout mattered. The south wing sat over the Régence nightclub, a basement space supported by columns — perfect for placing charges at the structural heart. Amichai Paglin (Irgun operations chief, alias “Gidi”) crafted the plan: teams would enter via the service entrance, dressed as Arab workmen and hotel staff (one in the distinctive uniform of the hotel’s Sudanese waiters), carrying milk churns packed with about 350 kg (770 lb) of explosives. The churns would be set by the main columns under the Secretariat wing. Timing was chosen to minimize foot traffic in the café area — late morning to just before lunch. Irgun claimed it tried to avoid civilian casualties; even within the Zionist underground there was infighting over timing, with Haganah wavering approval and then attempting to pull back. But once the operation went live, it belonged to Irgun.
The Warnings Controversy
The most bitter argument since has been whether warnings were given and ignored. Irgun says yes; the British inquest said any call never reached anyone with authority to evacuate. American writer Thurston Clarke later reconstructed a timeline: a 16-year-old Irgun recruit allegedly called the hotel switchboard at 12:22, speaking in Hebrew and English; the operator allegedly dismissed it. At 12:27, a second call went to the French Consulate next door; consulate staff took it seriously — opening windows and closing curtains to reduce blast pressure. At 12:31, a third call to the Palestine Post was relayed to police and then back to the hotel. In Clarke’s telling, someone at the hotel did identify milk churns in the basement — too late. Irgun’s leader Begin insisted the British refused to evacuate; the British, months later, said no warning reached anyone empowered to act. That fight became a propaganda trench — and a convenient way for Irgun to shift blame to the victims.
Execution and the First Blast
Irgun teams assembled around 7:00 am. They reached the Régence, placed six charges beneath the Secretariat wing, then set a small diversionary device outside to pull bystanders away. The diversion backfired: the British police later argued it drew people toward the southwest corner directly over the planted charges, increasing the death toll. Two Irgun men — Avraham Abramovitz and Itzhak Tsadok — were shot during approach/withdrawal; Abramovitz died of his wounds the next day.
12:37 — Collapse
At 12:37 pm, the main charges detonated. The western half of the south wing collapsed, pancaking floors and trapping officials, clerks, typists, soldiers, police, hotel staff, messengers, and random visitors. Royal Engineers arrived with lifting gear. Rescue turned into a three-day, three-shift operation; 2,000 loads of rubble were hauled off. Only a handful of people were pulled out alive; the last survivor, Assistant Secretary Downing C. Thompson, was found at hour 31 — he died a week later. Thirteen victims were so pulverized no remains could be identified.
Sound familiar? It’s the story of Gaza where we don’t even know how many tens of thousands of Palestinians are under the rubble.
The Dead and the Wounded
The final toll: 91 killed and 49 injured. By nationality: 41 Arabs, 28 Britons, 17 Jews, 2 Armenians, 1 Russian, 1 Greek, 1 Egyptian. By role: 21 senior officials, 49 junior staff, 13 soldiers, 3 policemen, and 5 bystanders. Among the Jewish dead were Yulius Jacobs (an Irgun sympathizer) and Edward Sperling (a Zionist writer and official) — a grim reminder that false flags don’t care who they kill once the explosion starts.
Denials, Then Reframing as “Heroism”
In the immediate aftermath, the Jewish Agency and the Zionist Congress publicly condemned the bombing; David Ben-Gurion called Irgun “the enemy of the Jewish people.” Newspapers like Hatsofeh branded the perpetrators “fascists.” Irgun’s first statement accepted responsibility only to scold the British for allegedly ignoring warnings. But after outrage cooled, Begin and others publicly embraced the bombing as legitimate resistance. In later decades memorial plaques would go up, glossing the warnings narrative and calling the dead “regretted” — while still celebrating the operation. In 2006, a 60th-anniversary event hosted by the Menachem Begin Heritage Center drew Benjamin Netanyahu; British diplomats protested commemorating what even MI5 and major encyclopedias have classified as terrorism.
Let me say it plainly - Israel CELEBRATES the day they killed nearly a hundred people, including dozens of British officials, and the current Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu attends these celebrations. And the UK helps fund them. It’s WILD.
The Sir John Shaw Libel Saga
Irgun worked hard to shift blame to Chief Secretary Sir John Shaw, alleging he received a warning and refused to evacuate because he “did not take orders from Jews.” Shaw flatly denied it. British witnesses nearby said they knew of no timely warning. Irgun narratives relied on a chain of hearsay that collapsed under scrutiny. Shaw sued newspapers and authors who repeated the story; they apologized or withdrew. Even former Irgun high command member Shmuel Katz later wrote the tale “can be dismissed.” The Shaw controversy shows how disinformation is baked into the false-flag method: commit the act, seed a story, force survivors to defend themselves while the bomber escapes.
Again, this formula is painfully relevant. How many times over the past 700 days did Israel commit some horrible atrocity, officially and forcefully blame Hamas, then just hope the public takes the bait until the story dies down? It’s damn near a daily occurrence at this point.
How Britain Reacted — and What It Changed
The attack inflamed British opinion. In Parliament, Prime Minister Clement Attlee called it a “brutal and murderous crime.” Ex-PM Winston Churchill, broadly pro-Zionist, condemned it. The British imposed curfews and had mass arrests (Operation Shark in Tel Aviv), sweeping up hundreds and sending many to Rafah detention. It also hardened the sense inside London that the Mandate was untenable, pushing the crisis toward the UN partition track — a point scholars argue both helped and hurt Irgun’s political goals. Either way, bombing civilians in disguise and then denying it became a template that outlived the British Mandate itself.
Why This Is a Fully Verified False Flag
Irgun fighters dressed as Arabs, planted explosives in milk churns, and detonated them under a building filled with British administrators, soldiers, and civilians. Zionist leadership initially denied responsibility, then blamed Arabs, then reframed the operation as heroic once the heat died down. The “we warned them” line remains contested, but even if you take Irgun’s spin at face value, warning a target you’ve booby-trapped doesn’t negate intent — it proves foreknowledge. This is exactly what a false flag is meant to do: mask the perpetrator, muddy the timeline, flip blame onto the enemy.
The Straight Line to Gaza
If this feels familiar, it should. The same four-step script is used today in Gaza: commit the act, deny responsibility, blame the victims (“human shields,” “command centers in hospitals”), and rewrite the narrative later. Israel’s leaders still insist civilian massacres are “tragic mistakes” or “Hamas’ fault,” just as Irgun insisted the British “refused warnings.” But the bodies are the bodies. Ninety-one killed in Jerusalem’s summer of 1946. At least 60,000 in Gaza today — 30,000 of them children. Disguise, denial, and the rebranding of terror as security is not an exception in Israel’s history. It is a through-line. It’s not a bug. It’s a feature.
This was 1946. This was before statehood. And it tells you something elemental about what followed. The bombing of the King David Hotel is not a footnote; it is the prologue to a decades-long pattern of false flag operations and blame-shifting that continues right now.
The Lavon Affair (1954): How a False Flag in Egypt Sparked War and a Nuclear Israel
Eight years after the King David Hotel bombing, Israel tried another false flag — this time in Cairo and Alexandria. The world knows it as the Lavon Affair. Inside Israel it was codenamed Operation Susannah. On paper it looked small: set off a few bombs in U.S. and British targets in Egypt, make it look like Egyptian nationalists had done it, and sour Western opinion on Egypt’s rising leader Gamal Abdel Nasser.
But in reality, this “minor” false flag set off shockwaves that changed the entire Middle East. It brought down an Israeli defense minister. It gave Egypt a reason to align with the Soviet Union. It fueled the Suez Crisis of 1956. And — as the historian Leonard Weiss has shown — it opened the door for Israel to get the nuclear bomb.
That’s the thing about false flags. They don’t just lie in the moment. They rewrite history itself.
The Plot: Operation Susannah
In the summer of 1954, Israeli military intelligence — known as Aman — activated a secret cell in Egypt called Unit 131. The operatives were not saboteurs flown in from Tel Aviv. They were young Egyptian Jews — students, clerks, doctors — recruited to act as locals. Their handler was a shadowy figure named Avri Elad, who called himself Paul Frank. His role remains controversial to this day.
The mission: bomb U.S. and British civilian sites. Targets included the United States Information Service (USIS) libraries in Cairo and Alexandria, British-owned cinemas, and even a railway facility. Devices were mostly incendiary bombs hidden in books or satchels, set on timers to go off at night. That way they would do damage but avoid mass casualties.
Why? Because it wasn’t about killing. It was about framing. If the bombs went off and the Americans and British thought it was Egyptian nationalists or the Muslim Brotherhood, then the West would see Nasser as dangerous, unstable, anti-Western. They would pull support from him, keep Britain’s grip on the Suez, and tilt closer to Israel.
This is the essence of a false flag. Do the crime. Dress it up as somebody else’s fingerprints. Sit back while the world blames your enemy.
The Blown Cover
On July 2, 1954, it all went sideways. An operative named Philip (or Robert) Natanson walked into a cinema with explosives. The device detonated early in his pocket. He was seized on the spot. Within days, Egyptian authorities rolled up the entire network.
Eleven people went on trial. Two of them — Dr. Moshe Marzouk and Shmuel Azar — were hanged in January 1955. Others got long sentences. Israel screamed that the men were innocent, framed in a show trial. But the evidence was undeniable: explosives, timing devices, testimony. This wasn’t an Egyptian frame-up. It was an Israeli false flag that had been caught red-handed.
Political Earthquake in Israel
Inside Israel, the fallout was ferocious. Pinhas Lavon, the Defense Minister, was blamed for authorizing the operation. He denied it. The army’s intelligence chief, Binyamin Gibli, said Lavon gave the order. Lavon said he hadn’t. In the storm that followed, Lavon was forced to resign.
This is why it became known as the “Lavon Affair.” But the deeper truth, which came out years later, was that Lavon may have been a scapegoat. Evidence showed the order didn’t come from him at all. The whole episode spiraled into a poisonous feud inside Israel’s ruling party. David Ben-Gurion, Shimon Peres, and Moshe Dayan lined up on one side; Lavon’s defenders on the other. For more than a decade, Israeli politics was haunted by the question: who really gave the order?
But here’s what nobody disputed: the operation itself was real. For decades Israel lied and said it was all an Egyptian fabrication. Finally, in 2005, Israel admitted the truth. Surviving members of the Unit 131 cell were officially honored as heroes. The state that once disowned them now pinned medals on their chests. I kid you not.
The Wider Fallout: Cairo, Moscow, Suez
This false flag didn’t just topple a minister. It rewired the region.
After the arrests, Israel retaliated with raids on Gaza, killing 39 Egyptians. Nasser responded by turning to the Soviet Union for arms. The Soviets supplied Egypt with modern weapons. In turn, the U.S. pulled back from supporting Egypt’s Aswan Dam project. Furious, Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal. That led directly to the Suez Crisis of 1956, when Israel, Britain, and France invaded Egypt.
Do you see the chain reaction? A botched false flag in Cairo helped trigger an arms race, a war, and a reshaping of Cold War alliances.
The Nuclear Consequence
And it goes deeper.
According to Leonard Weiss in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the Lavon Affair even helped Israel get the nuclear bomb. Here’s how:
When Israel joined Britain and France in the 1956 Suez invasion, France promised payment in kind: a nuclear reactor, uranium, and technology. This was the birth of the Dimona project — the secret desert complex where Israel built its arsenal. Weiss puts it plainly: “The nuclear program was France’s compensation to Israel for its role in the Suez war, which in turn was triggered in part by the failed covert action known as the Lavon Affair.”
So think about that. A false flag in Egypt in 1954 didn’t just blow up a cinema. It lit the fuse that ended with Israel as a clandestine nuclear power. The lies of Operation Susannah echo in the warheads of today.
Why This Is a Fully Verified False Flag
Strip away the spin, and the facts are simple:
Israeli intelligence recruited local agents to bomb U.S. and British targets.
Devices were designed to look like the work of Egyptian radicals.
The goal was to frame Egypt, damage Nasser, and sway the West.
The network was caught in the act.
Israel denied it for decades, then finally admitted it and honored the operatives.
That is the definition of a false flag.
The Islamic Lens on Treachery
Family, I need to pause here. Because this is exactly the kind of treachery Islam warned against.
The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ said plainly: “Do not betray, do not act treacherously, do not mutilate, and do not kill children.” (Sunan Ibn Majah). The Qur’an commands: “And do not mix the truth with falsehood, or conceal the truth while you know it.” (2:42).
What happened in Cairo in 1954 was the opposite. It was treachery as policy, deception as strategy. Innocents were used as pawns. Truth was buried under lies.
And for my non-Muslim readers, I want you to see something here. Islam’s rules of war — 1,400 years ago — outlawed exactly what Israel was doing in the 20th century. If you’ve ever been told Islam is the problem, know this: in Cairo in 1954, it was not Muslims planting bombs and blaming others. It was Israel.
From Cairo to Gaza
Why does this matter in 2025? Because the script never changed.
In Cairo, bombs in U.S. and British libraries → blame Egyptians.
In Gaza, bombs in hospitals → blame Hamas “command centers.”
In Cairo, captured operatives denied by Israel → later honored.
In Gaza, every mass killing written off as “tragic mistakes,” until years later when declassified documents will show otherwise.
The lie is the same: do the act, blame the Arab, and count on the world’s short memory.
The Moral Cost
The Lavon Affair didn’t just embarrass Israel. It told the world that Israel was willing to endanger its allies, kill civilians, lie about it, and honor the liars later. It created a permanent fog of deception that still hangs over every Israeli claim today.
So the next time you hear Israeli officials say that Gaza’s starving children are just “human shields,” remember Cairo in 1954. Remember the milk churns in the King David Hotel. Remember the cinemas in Alexandria. This isn’t a new story. It is the same story, running on repeat.
This is not conspiracy theory. Nah — it’s fact. And I invite you, I challenge you, to fact-check every line. The archives are open. The trials happened. The medals were awarded. Israel carried out a false flag terror campaign against U.S. and British sites, blamed Egyptians, got caught, lied for decades, and then admitted the truth.
From Cairo to Gaza, the playbook never changed.
The Lillehammer Affair (1973) and the Sabra & Shatila Massacre (1982): Deception Abroad, Denial at Home
The Lillehammer Affair: Mossad Kills the Wrong Man in Norway
In the summer of 1973, Israeli intelligence was still reeling from the Munich Olympics massacre the year before, when Palestinian militants killed 11 Israeli athletes. Golda Meir’s government unleashed “Operation Wrath of God,” a worldwide campaign to hunt and kill those tied — or alleged to be tied — to Munich.
The top target was Ali Hassan Salameh, a senior PLO leader nicknamed “the Red Prince.” Mossad believed he was the architect of Munich. On July 21, 1973, in the quiet Norwegian town of Lillehammer, Mossad agents moved in for the kill. But they got the wrong man.
The victim was Ahmed Bouchiki, a 30-year-old Moroccan immigrant and waiter. He had no ties to the PLO, no ties to terror, no ties to Munich. He was married to a pregnant Norwegian woman and walking home from the cinema when Mossad agents shot him in the street.
And here’s the false flag element: the killers were not posing as Israelis. They carried forged passports — Canadian, British, and others — leaving their allied nations to absorb the diplomatic heat. This was not just an assassination. It was an operation designed to look like it came from someone else.
Norwegian police acted quickly. Within days, they arrested six Mossad agents. The scandal blew open across Europe. Norway publicly condemned Israel. Canada and Britain were outraged at the abuse of their passports. The operation was exposed as a Mossad blunder, one of the worst in its history.
Israel at first denied responsibility, then quietly admitted involvement. Several agents served prison sentences in Norway before being released early. The masterminds slipped away. And Ali Hassan Salameh — the real target — lived on until 1979, when Mossad finally killed him in Beirut with a car bomb, again killing innocent bystanders in the process. It’s actually painful how familiar all of this is!
The Lillehammer Affair showed the world that Israel was willing to murder abroad, use other nations’ identities as cover, and then lie about it until caught. It was a false flag in the most literal sense: Israeli assassins carrying the forged flags of other countries.
For Norway, the tragedy never faded. For Israel, it was just another line in the playbook: commit the act, deny responsibility, then reframe it later as “necessary.”
The Sabra & Shatila Massacre: Outsourcing Slaughter, Denying Responsibility
Fast forward nine years. It is September 1982. Israel has invaded Lebanon, besieged Beirut, and forced the PLO leadership into exile. Israeli troops occupy the city’s outskirts. Inside Beirut lie the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps, crowded with Palestinian civilians — mostly women, children, and elderly men.
Israel’s ally in Lebanon was the Phalangist militia, a right-wing Christian group. On the night of September 16, 1982, Israeli forces allowed hundreds of Phalangist fighters to enter the camps. For two days, under the watch of Israeli flares lighting the night sky, the militia rampaged through the camps.
What followed was one of the most notorious massacres of the late 20th century. Between 2,000 and 3,500 Palestinian civilians were slaughtered. Women were raped before being killed. Children were executed in front of their families. The elderly were butchered in their homes. Bulldozers dug mass graves.
Israel’s role? The IDF controlled the perimeter of the camps. They lit up the night skies with flares. They blocked Palestinians from escaping. They supplied the Phalangists with logistical support. And yet, when the massacre became known, Israeli officials immediately claimed it was simply “a Lebanese affair” — a feud between militias, nothing to do with them.
This was the false flag element: Israel outsourced the killing to its allies, then blamed those allies alone, denying its own central role. To the world, they said: “We didn’t do it.” But the facts on the ground told another story: without Israel’s permission, protection, and support, the Phalangists could never have entered or carried out the massacre.
International outrage was overwhelming. In Israel itself, hundreds of thousands protested. Under pressure, Israel formed the Kahan Commission of Inquiry. In 1983, the Commission concluded that Israel bore “indirect responsibility” for the massacre. It singled out Defense Minister Ariel Sharon, saying he should have foreseen the risk of atrocities and acted to prevent them. Sharon was forced to resign.
But here is the bitter truth: no Israeli official ever faced criminal charges. Ariel Sharon — the man officially held responsible — later returned to politics and became Prime Minister of Israel. The massacre that should have ended his career instead became just another chapter in a pattern of denial and impunity. It seems like the State of Israel even rewards murderers and terrorists the most!
The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ taught: “The most detested of people to Allah is the one who is harsh in argument and denies the truth.” (Sahih Bukhari). That is exactly what happened here. The truth was clear: Israeli soldiers stood guard while women and children were slaughtered. And yet the state denied, deflected, and eventually minimized its role to “indirect responsibility.”
For the survivors of Sabra and Shatila, the denial is a second wound. To this day, they live with trauma and loss, while the men who enabled it went on to lead a state.
Why These Two Events Matter Together
The Lillehammer Affair and the Sabra & Shatila Massacre might look very different — one was an overseas assassination gone wrong, the other a mass slaughter in a besieged refugee camp. But together, they show the two faces of Israel’s false flag strategy.
Abroad, Mossad assassins carried forged passports, making their crimes look like the work of others.
At home and in occupied lands, Israel let its proxies do the killing, then denied responsibility.
Both are forms of deception. Both are forms of hiding the hand. Both are forms of false flags.
From Jerusalem’s King David Hotel in 1946, to Cairo in 1954, to Munich’s letter bombs in 1962, to the streets of Lillehammer in 1973, and the alleys of Sabra and Shatila in 1982, the pattern never changes. Commit the act. Deny responsibility. Blame someone else. Admit or reframe it decades later.
And that pattern — born before Israel was even officially a state — is the same one we see today when officials stand in front of cameras and tell you Gaza’s dead children were just “human shields.”
This is not conspiracy theory. It is history, verified and documented. And once you see the thread, you cannot unsee it.
The Pattern Never Stopped
Family, don’t think this story ended in the 1980s. Israel carried the false flag playbook forward into the modern age. In 1997, Mossad agents in Amman tried to kill Hamas leader Khaled Mashal using Canadian passports, leaving Jordan to pick up the pieces. In 2010, a team of assassins murdered Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai, again with a suitcase full of forged European and Australian passports. In the years that followed, Iranian scientists were blown up in Tehran streets while responsibility was planted on “local dissidents.” Each time, Israel disguised its hand, used the identities of others, and lied until it was caught.
From Jerusalem in 1946 to Tehran in 2020, the thread is unbroken: commit the act, deny responsibility, and let someone else take the blame. This is not rumor. This is not conspiracy theory. It is history — fully verified, fully documented, often admitted decades later by Israel itself. And once you see that pattern, you can never again hear Israeli denials — whether in Beirut, Tehran, or Gaza — without remembering the long trail of deception behind them.
Sisters and brothers, when you see the bodies of children pulled from the rubble in Gaza, and then hear Israeli officials rush to say it was “a Hamas command center” or “a tragic accident,” understand this: you are not hearing something new. You are hearing the same script Israel has used for nearly eighty years. From the King David Hotel to Cairo, from Munich to Lillehammer, from Beirut to Tehran — the tactic has always been the same. Commit the crime. Deny responsibility. Blame the Muslims. Rewrite the story later.
And that’s why Gaza matters so much right now. Because the lies are still running — but this time, we can see them in real time. We don’t have to wait decades for declassified files or commissions of inquiry. We can watch, on our phones and screens, the bombs falling on hospitals, schools, and refugee camps, and we can hear the denials as they’re spoken. This is not just history. It is the present. It is the genocide unfolding in front of us. And history demands we call it what it is.
👉🏽 Family, if you believe in fearless journalism that tells the truth when others bury it, I need you with me. Please join today as a monthly, annual, or founding member.
Love and appreciate each of you.
Your friend and brother,
Shaun
FYI: Please read, share, comment, and subscribe. That’s how we grow, break past propaganda, and hold the powerful accountable.
I am writing this new daily series telling you stories that Israel hopes and prays you never find out!
if you know that cia and mossad purposefully dressed up as arabs, committed heinous crimes, then blamed muslims all over the media, how can you believe what you heard the past 20+ years about Muslims?
We have the discretion to discredit every statement the mainstream news gave us because of repeated dishonesty