🚨 I want to get super nerdy and tell you how math proves a scandal in the United States Senate

55% of Americans say Gaza is a genocide. 77% of Democrats say it. Yet just 1 of 100 U.S. Senators says the word. The math proves this is not democracy — it’s what happens when the Senate is paid for.

Family, let me show you something extraordinary — and infuriating. This week Bernie Sanders became the first United States Senator to call Gaza a genocide. But here’s the problem: Bernie is 1 out of 100. That means that 714 days into this campaign of mass death, a staggering 99% of the Senate refuse to call it a genocide.

That’s not just disappointing. It’s not just shameful. It’s mathematically impossible if the Senate actually reflected the American people. And that’s why I need you with me to keep naming these truths the mainstream refuses to even whisper. Please become a monthly, annual, or founding member.

What the People Already Know

Let’s get the baseline clear. Bernie isn’t ahead of the people — he finally caught up to them.

• 55% of all Americans already say Gaza is genocide.

• 77% of Democrats say it.

• Nearly 90% of Bernie’s base says it.

If the Senate reflected the people even a little, 55 out of 100 Senators would already be using the word. Instead, we have 1.

How is that possible?

Well, mathematically, without major outside interference, it’s not possible. Let me explain…

---

The Impossible Odds

So let’s get nerdy and talk math for a moment, because this isn’t just morally outrageous — it’s statistically impossible.

Imagine you pulled 100 random Americans off the street. Based on polling, about 55 of them would say Gaza is genocide. That’s what the data says. So what are the odds that in that group of 100 people, only one would say it, while 99 stayed silent?

Here’s the math, simplified step by step:

• Probability a random person does not say Gaza is genocide = 45%.

• Probability that 99 out of 100 wouldn’t say it = 0.45^99 ≈ 3 × 10^-35.

• Multiply that by the chance of exactly 1 saying it, and you get about 7 × 10^-34.

Now, I don’t expect everybody to know what that number means, so let me put it in plain English: it’s like 1 chance in 10^33. That’s a 1 followed by 33 zeros.

For scale:

• Odds of winning the Powerball jackpot: 1 in 300 million.

• Odds of flipping a coin and getting heads 100 times in a row: 1 in 1.27 × 10^30.

• Odds of the United States Senate actually representing the people and having only ONE person calling Gaza a genocide? Even smaller.

This is not 1 in a million. It’s not 1 in a billion. It’s closer to 1 in a decillion. That’s 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

Those are the odds of having a Senate arrive at this result naturally.

And here’s the kicker: the only way our observation makes sense mathematically is if every Senator had only about a 4.7% chance of saying “genocide.” In other words, to make this outcome “normal,” we’d have to believe Senators live in an alternate universe where only 1 in 20 people thinks Gaza is genocide — when in reality, more than half of Americans do.

---

In Plain English

So what does all this nerdy math mean? It means this: it is impossible for 55% of Americans to say genocide while only 1% of Senators say it, unless something or someone has captured the Senate.

It’s not democracy. It’s not chance. It’s not “just how the numbers worked out.”

It is money. It’s AIPAC. It is lobbying. It is fear. It is institutional capture.

Simply put the United States Senate does not remotely represent the American people. It represents Israel. It represents AIPAC. It represents billionaires. It represents donor pressure, party machinery, and political survival instincts that tell 99 Senators: stay quiet.

---

Family, Pause With Me Here

If you see the pattern — if you understand that this silence isn’t random but systemic — share this post. Don’t let silence harden into complicity.

---

Why This Matters

Because this isn’t an abstract math exercise. It’s about people dying while leaders refuse to name their suffering.

Think about Rwanda. Think about Bosnia. Think about how the world ducked the word genocide until it was too late. History doesn’t forgive silence. It doesn’t forgive cowardice.

And yet today, in 2025, we see 55% of Americans naming genocide, while 99 Senators remain silent. That silence will be remembered in the same breath as Rwanda, Bosnia, and every other atrocity where leaders failed to act.

That includes Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, and anyone else you see as a liberal member of the Senate. They are all on the wrong side here - and it’s not an accident. They’ve all been bought and paid for.

---

The Moral of the Numbers

The numbers tell the story clearly:

• The people are awake.

• The Senate is held hostage.

• And Bernie is currently the lone proof that it is possible to speak the word.

But family, naming genocide is just the beginning. It must be followed by votes to cut arms, calls for ceasefire, demands for accountability.

The math proves the silence isn’t random. The history proves silence is deadly. The morality proves silence is complicity.

---

Stand With Me Against Silence

Mainstream outlets will not run this math. They won’t spell out how impossible it is. They’ll let you believe it’s just “politics as usual.” But family, the numbers don’t lie. This Senate silence is not natural. It is purchased.

And most media outlets have been purchased as well. You know it’s true.

And I need you with me to keep saying that out loud. Please become a monthly, annual, or founding member. The only reason I can publish this here, uncensored, is because this platform is powered by you.

Silence is complicity.
Silence is complicity.
Silence is complicity.

Love and appreciate each of you.
Your friend and brother,
Shaun

Three More Truths

Family, here are three more truths I’ve written that I don’t want you to miss. Please read them, share them, and let them fuel you the same way writing them fueled me: