This makes no sense. Why would they approach her vehicle in the first place? She and the other vehicles were leaving the area. It is impossible to believe the agent who shot her feared for his life while he was videotaping the entire incident with his phone. She said to him. Dude, It’s okay, I am not mad at you. Right before he shot her to death. He said, “Fuc**n Bit**” after he shot her. Who has all the aggression? It was not her. It is clear her intention was to leave the area. There is no rationalization for her murder. None. Except his inability to handle himself properly and put his partner in harms way.
They are very often soldiers returning from Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan etc... Seems like in their mind there are still in the war zone... That's "America", "american values"...
“Rule of federal agencies over everyone else” is J Edgar Hoover and the era of lynching a mirror image of the Stasi using COINTELPRO to infiltrate, disrupt, malign and destroy movements.
Could you please face the reality that Israel doesn't control CBS, the weather, the United States, or anything else? Israel is a country like any other, run by people, and it doesn't control or try to control anything or anyone else. Saying that undemines any argument that might actually make sense
And so CBS did post the interview online, so no conspiracy, no hiding, no suppression.
First, let's be honest, the odds of him being convicted of murder are less than the odds of the guy who murdered Hind Rajab being convicted. There might be a trial, eventually, that'll ONLY be about the 'split second' between him grabbing for his gun and shooting the first shot, and only from HIS perspective. Everything that makes it obvious that this was a 'worst officer on scene' escalating things to 'show his power' will be inadmissable or legally irrelevant, like her having turned her wheels AWAY from him, or the narrative about 'obstructing' the team that blocked her way forward and when she tried to go around the blockage, moved in after blocking the road themselves.
He was looking straight at her as she cranked the steering wheel as far to the right as possible, but 'his reasonable belief that she was aiming towards him on the left' is the only thing any criminal verdict will hinge on.
The venue would be changed if there was a chance of an 'activist judge', but even a lobal one wouldn't risk offending the police force by establishing a precedent that could be used against them.
It took literally an agonizing slow suffocation to get a murder conviction, this will be considered a 'split second decision' instance and follow the pattern of excluding EVERYTHING but 'reasonable belief his life was in danger'
I want you all to see all of this
I'm hoping that this is going to be the beginning of their end, but I fear that this is the beginning of our end.
It could truly go either way
This makes no sense. Why would they approach her vehicle in the first place? She and the other vehicles were leaving the area. It is impossible to believe the agent who shot her feared for his life while he was videotaping the entire incident with his phone. She said to him. Dude, It’s okay, I am not mad at you. Right before he shot her to death. He said, “Fuc**n Bit**” after he shot her. Who has all the aggression? It was not her. It is clear her intention was to leave the area. There is no rationalization for her murder. None. Except his inability to handle himself properly and put his partner in harms way.
I agree
Perfectly explained! This excessive force needs to be reciprocated right back to them
Defund ICE NOW. DISARM NAZI MURDERERS. JAIL THEM ALL.
Agreed. But they are funded for years and years to come. Approved by Democrats and Republicans
This is absolute fixed rubbish. I’ve been told by someone that some ICE agents are ex-idf - that would certainly fit with what’s going on.
Some are.
They are very often soldiers returning from Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan etc... Seems like in their mind there are still in the war zone... That's "America", "american values"...
“Rule of federal agencies over everyone else” is J Edgar Hoover and the era of lynching a mirror image of the Stasi using COINTELPRO to infiltrate, disrupt, malign and destroy movements.
Spot on
You can see his legs are completely out of the direction the car was going in
Indeed
Seems like she panicked ?
Because they are state run propaganda
Could you please face the reality that Israel doesn't control CBS, the weather, the United States, or anything else? Israel is a country like any other, run by people, and it doesn't control or try to control anything or anyone else. Saying that undemines any argument that might actually make sense
And so CBS did post the interview online, so no conspiracy, no hiding, no suppression.
I guess you didn’t see what leading Israelis have said about CBS this week. They said it’s the most important outlet in Israel. Literally
First, let's be honest, the odds of him being convicted of murder are less than the odds of the guy who murdered Hind Rajab being convicted. There might be a trial, eventually, that'll ONLY be about the 'split second' between him grabbing for his gun and shooting the first shot, and only from HIS perspective. Everything that makes it obvious that this was a 'worst officer on scene' escalating things to 'show his power' will be inadmissable or legally irrelevant, like her having turned her wheels AWAY from him, or the narrative about 'obstructing' the team that blocked her way forward and when she tried to go around the blockage, moved in after blocking the road themselves.
He was looking straight at her as she cranked the steering wheel as far to the right as possible, but 'his reasonable belief that she was aiming towards him on the left' is the only thing any criminal verdict will hinge on.
Unless the prosecution is local
The venue would be changed if there was a chance of an 'activist judge', but even a lobal one wouldn't risk offending the police force by establishing a precedent that could be used against them.
It took literally an agonizing slow suffocation to get a murder conviction, this will be considered a 'split second decision' instance and follow the pattern of excluding EVERYTHING but 'reasonable belief his life was in danger'